Friends of the Box-Ironbark Forests

About 20 walkers of all ages set off from the Chewton Post Office along the Forest Creek Track on the first FOBIF bushwalk of the year. Local resident, Marie Jones, led the walk.

First stop was to appreciate the landscape at the Monster Meeting site at the confluence of Wattle and Forest Creeks. Then it was off upstream past the stone sculptures, the three exclusion plots erected to monitor re-vegetation taking place, the spectacular post-goldrush cliffs at Chinamans Point and several revegetation sites in the valley. Morning tea was a break called at Expedition Pass Reservoir – after the first 5.4 kms of the walk had been completed. Continue reading →

The North Central CMA has produced a Draft Regional Waterways Strategy (2014-2022) which is currently open for public comment until 10 April 2014. The Waterway Strategy sets priorities and outlines an action plan for the region’s rivers and wetlands for the next 8 years. Five regional community forums have been organised to seek feedback from interested community members. The local one will take place at the Campbells Creek Community Centre at 7.30pm on 18 March 2014. You can view all the details about the forums in this flyer and the Draft Waterways Strategy can be accessed here.

Every year Newstead Landcare Group is fortunate to have some remarkable people present on an amazing array of topics and 2014 promises to be another such year. Their first presentation will be “Combining Ecology and Archaeology – researching Indigenous fish traps to learn more about river changes over time” by archaeologist Damian Kelly. Damian’s research on fish traps along the Murray is truly fascinating, with very local implications for those of us on the Loddon. For those familiar with the road between Strangways and Guildford, do you know where the name “Bough Yards” may have come from?

The presentation will be on Thursday 20^th March at Newstead Community Centre, starting at 8pm. It will be followed by a light supper and their first business meeting for 2014. All are welcome to come along for either the presentation or the meeting or both of course. Gold coin donations would be appreciated.

Check out an amazing photo of Brewarrina traps, circa 1900, Geoff Park’s Blog.

This year FOBIF has expanded its walks program to include 2 family walks and 2 youth walks. Everyone is welcome on these walks, not just young people and children.

The first of the family walks will take place on 23 March in Kalimna Park. To find out more, click on the green box below.

The first youth walk will be on 30 March. To find out more, click on the image below.

The consent authority form form must be completed by the parents/carers of unaccompanied young people before the youth walk. Meet at Castlemaine Community Education (30 Templeton Street) at 9.30am to get on bus. Walkers will be back at Templeton Street at 1pm.

Mount Alexander Shire Council held its first Sustainability and Environment Round Table at the Council Chambers on Thursday March 6^th.  Relevant stakeholder representatives were invited and about 40 people came along to discuss the Terms of Reference that had been circulated prior to the roundtable – the light refreshments provide by CAKE certainly helped to start the conversations going.

The invitation included the comment that ‘the roundtable is to act as a catalyst in achieving positive and tangible change for our natural and built environments.’

Councillors Christine Henderson and Jess Howard set the scene and the session was facilitated by Russell Fisher.  Christine asked each person to tell the group about their wish (money and regulations aside) for the future which was an insightful as well as entertaining way of everyone getting a picture of who was at the roundtable and why they were there.

When the conversation went on to the possible terms of reference there appeared to be two lines of thought – to be theme-based where there could be possible strategies and actions, or to be more a sharing of information and ideas.  Perhaps it should be a combination of both?

We are waiting for a report on the roundtable from the council staff but this event will start off many conversations in the community about how this roundtable will be managed into the future.

Readers will remember that in our post on the new waterways strategy we commented that climate change and its consequences for our waterways seemed to have been written out of policy. Instead we got bland references to ‘natural climate variability’, and no real idea of planning for medium to long term drop in rainfall.

Now we read that the state’s Environment Commissioner, Kate Auty, has resigned, attacking the state government’s indifference and lack of leadership on climate change. Among other things, Professor Auty said that ‘public servants had told her about directions to them that they should refer to ”climate variability”, not climate change’.

Do words matter? They do if you use words that mislead, or make it harder to see the truth. And it would be very disturbing if it were true that expert civil servants are being directed to use misleading words by politicians with no expertise in the subject in question.

A proposal is currently being developed to put a mountain bike track in the Hancock pine plantation on the western side of Mount Alexander.

FOBIF is not opposed to this idea. Mountain biking  is an activity with many health benefits, and there is some potential–as yet undefined–for economic spin offs in the form of tourism to the Harcourt area.

Mount Alexander, west side: illegal mountain bike use on these slopes could cause serious erosion problems

We are, however, keen that any track design should minimise the possibility that the activity will spill over into the present boundaries of the Mt Alexander Regional Park. Photos are in circulation suggesting that a track in the plantation could be linked to the Leanganook picnic area. And some illegal riding takes place already: videos can be seen on Youtube of riders using walking tracks on the Mount. Such riding is capable of causing serious erosion on the steep western slopes, and of straying onto precious moss beds on the eastern side.

We understand that the plantation will be added to the Regional Park in 2015. We’ve written to Parks Victoria ranger in charge David Major on the subject. He informed us to our surprise that Parks is not represented on the committee developing the MTB proposal, but said: ‘Some years ago Parks Victoria looked at the feasibility of mountain bike access to Mount Alexander, and was able to identify that existing tracks around Leanganook could possibly be used by mountain bikes for cross country riding, but the use of downhill mountain bikes was not suited to the area and would not be permitted…Parks Victoria is looking to stop [illegal downhill use] and rehabilitate track damage.’

FOBIF is keen to be engaged in any plans which might have an effect on the Mount. At present the concept development for the plantation, led by Goldfields Tourism, seems to be in capable hands: but this mountain, being one of the most beautiful and dramatic natural features in the region, could be put under pressure if this project is pushed through without all appropriate knowledge, care and resources.

Nothing is as simple as it seems.

Here’s a new perspective on rubbish: when Parks Victoria ranger Noel Muller was rearranging a trailer full of rubbish at Golden Point after clean up day on Sunday, he noticed something unexpected sticking out of the side of one of his collection of decrepit mattresses, collected earlier on the edge of Kalimna Park.

It was the head of a phascogale, rather surprised to find its comfortable accommodation bounced around so much.

As we’ve reported in a previous post, the phascogale is a pretty opportunistic creature: it’s been found in filing boxes and coat pockets before. It’s a bit unsettling to find it settling into a mouldy mattress, however.

Noel took the mattress back to where it was collected, to give the phascogale a chance to collect its wits.

The goal of good land management is to create new, resilient landscapes, not to restore ‘original vegetation’, Ian Lunt told Connecting Country’s first public meeting for 2014 in Newstead on Sunday.

140 people turned up to hear Professor Lunt talk about natural regeneration, a phenomenon which has created much more native vegetation than any deliberate restoration programs. He cited several examples of this, including the figure that in the Heathcote Graytown area, native regrowth is covering an extra 1800 hectares every decade.

Natural regeneration: barely noticeable in the short term, but a major feature of landscape change in the last 60 years.

This process is partly the result of the decline of grazing on marginal land, and the growth of the ‘amenity landscape’, in which farming is being displaced by smaller blocks of land managed for recreational or other purposes.

Where do land restoration advocates fit into this picture? Professor Lunt urged his listeners not to entertain dreams of bringing back some kind of ideal landscape, but rather to embrace the ‘human landscape’ we have inherited from the recent past, and work with it.

The goal should be to ‘create resilient connected landscapes, not restore original vegetation.’ The ideal landscape would consist of areas in production, integrated with regrowth areas, remnant vegetation and areas planted out with native vegetation for specific reasons.

Those working on improving landscapes, he argued, should be aiming to fill biodiversity gaps [in totally cleared areas, for example], to fast track desirable changes, and to add features missing from the landscape, like habitat hollows. In agriculturally productive areas, small corridor projects are appropriate.

His ideal is a ‘pluralism’ or ‘complementarity’ of approaches to land: ‘This is creating landscapes we haven’t had before: we have to create totally new ways of thinking and talking about these unimagined landscapes.’

Professor Lunt’s talk was the first in Connecting Country’s workshop series, ‘Improve biodiversity on your property.’

Vegetation ecologist Ian Lunt is Associate Professor in the School of Environmental Science at Charles Sturt University. His brilliant blog can be found at http://ianluntecology.com/

A CSIRO fire management report on Aboriginal burning in the Great Western Woodlands of south western WA has revealed some interesting facts about traditional approaches to fire in the woodlands.

The report was written to document the Ngadju people’s knowledge of fire. Its key findings include:

·‘The extensive old growth woodlands were rarely burnt deliberately, because they take hundreds of years to recover.

·‘The extensive sandplain shrublands were only occasionally burnt with planned fire. Mostly they burnt naturally by wildfires that were allowed to take their course.

·‘Rather, Ngadju used fire as a cultural tool for keeping the country clear around rockholes, for encouraging grasses in open grasslands and mallee, and to smoke out animals when hunting. These fires were often small, around 1 ha.

·‘They also used fire to protect important cultural sites and special plants such as water trees; and to maintain access along walking tracks and in coastal shrublands.

·‘Other activities such as firewood collecting around the edges of woodlands and rockholes, and sweeping and scraping up litter around individual trees, were undertaken to help control wildfire.

·‘Ultimately these activities would have led to a fine-scale fire mosaic over the top of the natural vegetation mosaic.’

This summary of the findings is taken from John Morgan’s Plant Ecology Blog. Morgan comments, ‘As a land management tool, fire obviously has a more select role in Ngadju country than in other regions of Australia such as the tropical savannah and spinifex country where large parts of the landscape are frequently burnt.’

The moral of this story, from our point of view, is that different country requires different treatment. This is a common sense idea, the antithesis of the Victorian policy of burning five per cent of public land, irrespective of its ecological needs. The five per cent target never had credibility ecologically. Its effectiveness as a public safety measure has been questioned by the Royal Commission Implementation Monitor. Now, in the wake of large grass fires this summer, the Fire Services Commissioner, Craig Lapsley, has stated that a move away from the crude target is ‘most certainly being considered.’

The CSIRO report can be found here