Reminder: FOBIF AGM Monday 12 August 2024

Our FOBIF AGM will take place at 7.30 on 12 August in the Senior Citizens Centre, Mechanics Lane (next to the library). After a brief AGM, Geoff Park will give a presentation on Woodland birds in central Victoria – historical observations, current status and future prospects. 

There are several vacancies on the FOBIF committee for the coming year and we are encouraging interested people to consider joining. There is a link to nomination forms and more information on the Geoff’s presentation  here.

Posted in News | Comments Off on Reminder: FOBIF AGM Monday 12 August 2024

Rethinking Planned Burns – Philip Zylstra, August 20th 2024

Kinglake Friends of the Forests, Friends of Box Ironbark Forests, Friends of the Whipstick and the Whroo Goldfields Conservation Network have engaged Dr Zylstra to speak at a public meeting at the Castlemaine Senior Citizens Centre at 7pm on Tuesday 20th August to explain his studies and model of bushfire behaviour. We are hopeful that a greater understanding of fire behaviour will lead to a review of the practice of prescribed burning, greater protection for the flora and fauna of the forests and a reduced risk of bushfires for communities.

Forest Fire Management Victoria (FFMV) plan to burn 10,000 Ha of forest in the Murray -Goldfields districts in the next 2 years. This is despite acknowledgement by the Victorian state department of Environment, Energy and Climate Action, DEECA that “Box-Ironbark forests are considered not prone to recurrent fires, making them possibly atypical of dry, sclerophyllous vegetation in Australia.” Continue reading

Posted in Fire Management, News | Comments Off on Rethinking Planned Burns – Philip Zylstra, August 20th 2024

A gate? No worries. Cinnamon what? Who cares?

In January we reported on the closure of Loop Track in the south of the Diggings Park–a measure designed to limit the spread of Cinnamon Fungus.

Track closures are a tricky matter, because there’s a constituency which believes it has the right to drive anywhere, regardless of the consequences. And so, almost inevitably, we have this:

Loop Track, July 28: a gate is ineffective against a determined and ignorant driver.

There are probably people who will never be persuaded to give nature priority over whatever they feel like doing: but it’s a fair bet that the majority of our community, given the right information, are willing to give the bush a fair go.

And here’s the problem: the notice on the Loop Track gate explaining why the gate is there is a fragile piece of paper encased in plastic. As of last week, it had fallen off the gate and was lying in mud.

As we’ve said before, clear and effective community education is far more important than any number of regulations, where the environment is concerned. A wide community consensus is central if problems like wood theft, rubbish dumping and track abuse are to be reduced.

And active ranger engagement with the wider community is a key part of that. Unfortunately miserly funding has rendered rangers an endangered species in our bushlands. And a respectful approach to nature is harder to encourage in a world where regular TV commercials encourage drivers to get out and bash the bush to their hearts content…

Posted in News | Comments Off on A gate? No worries. Cinnamon what? Who cares?

Signs: where should they be, what should they say?

Readers may remember our reporting of a project to put new visitor info boards along the Goldfields Track. That was two years ago, and we’ve heard nothing till recently about the state of the project.

Now we believe that the plan is to put 80 information signs along the track between Ballarat and Bendigo.

FOBIF has expressed its interest in this project, and its two main concerns:

  1. That the signs tell the truth about the landscape we live in, and not wallow in heritage guff.
  2. That the track not be cluttered with signs. We believe the great charm of the track lies in its feeling of loneliness and abandonment. That feeling would be ruined by a plethora of signs telling people what to see.

Our concerns are not a criticism of the Goldfields Track committee, which is implementing the project.Our concerns are based on past experience with local signage. A good example is a board recently erected in the Walmer State Forest, part of which is shown here:

Walmer State Forest interpretation board: the geological information is wrong, and the photo has nothing to do with the text.

 

What’s wrong with the sign?

The main problem is that the photo is not of a sedimentary hill, granitic basin or volcanic plain: It’s of  a sluiced and degraded area. Why can’t the text say so? It’s hard to resist the feeling that the author(s) would do anything to avoid saying, ‘Our natural landscape has been ravaged by gold seekers, and is slowly recovering.’

Interestingly, a nearby sign with info on Indigenous culture refers to our landscapes as ‘upside down country’–a phrase which perfectly sums up the facts. It’s a pity tourism promoters and heritage experts haven’t taken it on board.

There are other problems with the sign, but its evasion of the recent facts is the most obvious: to put it plainly, it’s misinformation. We’re hoping the Goldfields Track Committee doesn’t fall into the same error. We’ve strongly suggested that the authors of all future signage thoroughly consult Susan Lawrence and Peter Davies terrifying book, Sludge: disaster on Victoria’s goldfields. A few quotes from that book would fit well onto a signboard.

Posted in News | 1 Comment

Storm landscapes

Visitors to our bushlands can come across them surprisingly often: patches, usually quite limited in area, in which it seems that a monster has threshed around, snapping substantial trees and spreading havoc.

Storm damage: sometimes it can be terrifying, and the damage extensive. An example is the Wombat Forest storm of 2021. In our region the impacts have been more limited, though you wouldn’t want to be around when the wind crashes in.

Storm damage, Brown’s gully, 2024: are storms one of nature’s regeneration strategies?

The fascinating question is, what’s the ecological impact of these events? After all, they’ve been happening for as long as the forest has existed. Forester Ron Hateley, in his 2010 book The Victorian bush, puts the question differently and more aggressively: ‘What’s wrong with dead trees and patches of dead forest?’ He proposes that such patches are important for the preservation of biodiversity, and that patches of dead or unhealthy trees are important components of a healthy forest. And in fact there’s plenty of research to show that disturbance is ‘an important requirement for forest regeneration’ and soil renewal. But of course, the nature and scale of the disturbance do matter.

Crocodile Reservoir road, April 2015: storm events are reasonably common in our bushlands.

It would be an interesting project to map storm damaged sites in our bushlands, and observe the changes that have followed them. In the meantime, maybe we shouldn’t necessarily be cast down on coming across a patch of blasted trees and crushed understorey. Maybe they’re sites of renewal.

Storm aftermath, Tarilta, June 2018: small areas of disturbance can introduce diversity of plant life and micro climates into a forest.

Posted in Nature Observations, News | Comments Off on Storm landscapes