Category Archives: Fire Management

Kalimna: weeds, fuel, fire

Posted on 23 February, 2013 by fobif

FOBIF has produced a weed map of the south western corner of Kalimna Park. This section of about 24 ha—essentially  the area from Kalimna Point to the golf course— is currently scheduled as a DSE Zone 1 asset protection burn … Continue reading →

Posted in Fire Management, News | Comments Off on Kalimna: weeds, fuel, fire

FOBIF loses at VCAT on Diamond Gully development

Posted on 9 February, 2013 by fobif

The objections by FOBIF and some local residents to current proposals to build a housing development at Diamond Gully were rejected at the Victorian Administrative Appeals Tribunal in December. The VCAT decision was reported in detail in the Midland Express … Continue reading →

Posted in Fire Management, News | Comments Off on FOBIF loses at VCAT on Diamond Gully development

Poverty Gully Burning [1]: what’s it for?

Posted on 6 February, 2013 by fobif

The Poverty Gully management burn [CAS 008] was a Zone 1 fuel reduction exercise covering 99.6 hectares on the Castlemaine town side of the Dingo Park road, north of Poverty Gully Track. It was conducted late last year. The Arthur’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Fire Management, News | Comments Off on Poverty Gully Burning [1]: what’s it for?

Poverty Gully Burning [2]: a review

Posted on 6 February, 2013 by fobif

Here are some impressions of the Poverty Gully burns. We’ve divided them into six sections, and would be interested in any further member comments. We’ve made no effort to assess the burns’ success in reducing fuel. The interdepartmental shemozzle problem … Continue reading →

Posted in Fire Management, News | Comments Off on Poverty Gully Burning [2]: a review

‘Due consideration’: does this mean, ‘Not interested’?

Posted on 1 December, 2012 by fobif

FOBIF has received a reply from the Minister for Bushfire Response, Peter Ryan. We asked him if he had considered Royal Commission Monitor Neil Comrie’s recommendation that the five per cent burning target be revised. It’s now clear from the … Continue reading →

Posted in Fire Management | Comments Off on ‘Due consideration’: does this mean, ‘Not interested’?

Burning season under way

Posted on 25 November, 2012 by fobif

With DSE starting burns around Castlemaine, it’s worth clarifying what the Department’s targets are. The following has been supplied to us by DSE for land within the Murray Goldfields district: Zone: 1. Asset protection 2. Bushfire management 3. Landscape management … Continue reading →

Posted in Fire Management | 1 Comment

We have the answer, but where’s the answer? [and what’s Hawkeye?]

Posted on 22 November, 2012 by fobif

FOBIF has had another go at finding out what if anything the Government intends to do about the Royal Commission Monitor’s suggestion that the five per cent target be revised. The letter we received from DSE Director of Fire, Lee … Continue reading →

Posted in Fire Management | Comments Off on We have the answer, but where’s the answer? [and what’s Hawkeye?]

Questions to the minister…and answers

Posted on 18 November, 2012 by fobif

In October FOBIF wrote to the Minister for Bushfire Recovery, Peter Ryan, the Minister for Conservation, Ryan Smith, and the National Party member for Northern Victoria, Damian Drum, regarding the government’s planned burning program. We asked how the Government was … Continue reading →

Posted in Fire Management, News | Comments Off on Questions to the minister…and answers

Fire meeting

Posted on 13 November, 2012 by fobif

On 1st November a concerned group of people from Castlemaine, Bendigo and surrounding areas, meeting in the Chewton Town Hall, decided to form a network to lobby and campaign for major changes to the State Government’s current and forthcoming fuel … Continue reading →

Posted in Fire Management, News | Comments Off on Fire meeting

Bendigo fire meeting [1]: what’s happening on the ground?

Posted on 14 October, 2012 by fobif

On Tuesday October 9 DSE officials met with about 30 individuals and representatives of conservation groups to discuss outcomes of the consultation process around the Fire Operations Plan. The discussion was limited by the fact that the biggest factor in … Continue reading →

Posted in Fire Management, News | 1 Comment