Friends of the Box-Ironbark Forests

The Victorian National Parks Association is campaigning against the State Government’s decision to open our parks to commercial development. The VNPA has issued the following statement:

‘On Easter Sunday (31 March 2013), the State Government released new guidelines for ‘tourism investment’ in national parks.’The guidelines invite private developments in two-thirds of our national parks – essentially hanging a ‘for sale’ sign on our finest natural areas. National parks are primarily protected areas for nature conservation, sensitive recreation and respite – not for commercial property development.

Otway NP: There is no evidence that commercial developments in National Parks bring any improvements in park management. The chief beneficiaries are the developers.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

‘The government proposes to give property developers up to 99 year leases, which is effectively selling sites in parks.

‘The guidelines have a number of vague principles, and outline a five-stage approval process, but the provisions for community consultation are weak.

‘Alarmingly, it is not until development of a full proposal that a detailed environmental management plan will be required, leaving no opportunity for community comment on this critical aspect.

‘Worldwide experience shows it is the investors who benefit most from private developments in parks, not the majority of park visitors and certainly not the parks themselves.

Continue reading →

The State Government’s decision to open National Parks to commercial development [see above] has its origins way back in the Kennett era, but surfaced more recently in a report published by the Labour Government in 2008. It’s called Victoria’s Nature based tourism strategy 2008-12 . This report was enthusiastically endorsed by then Conservation Minister Gavin Jennings and Tourism Minister Tim Holding in 2010. A critical account of it can be found here.

The report pointed out that over 28 million people visit our parks every year [a figure which puts paid to the idea that parks ‘lock out’ people]: the problem is that they don’t spend enough money. The strategy devoted its attention to ways we can attract rich people to our parks and get them to spend. Among other things it enthusiastically endorsed the idea of ‘products’: for example, it liked a ‘premium penguin viewing product’ available at Phillip Island. This involves getting people to pose for faked photos making them look as if they’re up close and personal with penguins. Similarly, the report talks, not of encourageing people to go for a walk, but of getting them to ‘buy a walk product’.

It’s worth comparing this kind of objective with the purposes of parks, as set out in the National Parks Act first passed by a Liberal Government in 1975. In this document Parks are

Continue reading →

A group of 20 eager bushwalkers emerged from their summer hiatus to participate in the first walk of the 2013 FOBIF calendar.  The walk was led by Chris Johnston, who has built up a considerable body of knowledge about the Maldon Historic Reserve and the Muckleford Forest. 

The walk commenced at the ruins of the Gowar School and wended its way through impressive box-ironbark forest up to Smiths Reef Dam, built in 1860.  A number of native under storey species were identified along the way.  Following a break for morning tea at Smiths Reef Dam, the group explored a number of the digging sites to the east of the dam.   

Hairy mullock heaps. Photo by Dominique Lavie

Photo by Dominique Lavie

A disturbed bottle dump was located with many fragments of old bottles still present.  The archaeological knowledge of one of the walkers (from Kyneton) was put to good use in describing the style of the bottles, the production processes and the possible uses.

The walk continued along the Spur Track with a marked contrast observable in the vegetation on either side of the track resulting from previous prescribed burns.

Photo by Frank Forster

A lunch break was taken in the lee of a large rocky outcrop providing an interesting micro-climate for small ground covers, ferns and lichen.

After lunch the group returned along Clarry’s Track and the Gowar Road, taking note of the areas designated for prescribed burns in autumn 2014.  Chris Johnston is coordinating a data collection exercise in the designated area and is seeking a few volunteers to assist in the process.  This is scheduled for Sunday 14 April;  please email mucklefordffg@bigpond.com if interested.

This walk was a great start to the 2013 program, and thanks are due to Chris Johnston for her detailed preparation and informed guidance. You can view more of Dominique Lavie’s photos by clicking on her Facebook page.

It’s a map ‘full of quiet calm, still, beautiful’, says Latrobe University historian Gerry Gill. There’s a ‘soft, comfortable, nostalgic light’ in it. But it’s also ‘terrible, disturbing’.

Gill is referring to the Selwyn map, produced in 1852 and showing the area between the Campaspe and Loddon Rivers, with Mount Alexander at its centre.

You can have a look at the map via our 2011 Post. It is in fact very beautiful, but Gill’s point is that it is a document which essentially records the state of the environment as it was under Aboriginal management. By showing numerous squatting stations on the best land, it is also a record of dispossession.

Bendigo Creek. Early observers watched kingfishers and platypus in the creek. A Royal Commission recommended the engineered gutter solution to the destruction wrought by gold seekers.

The map is on display at the Bendigo Post Office Gallery. It’s part of an exhibition which also includes two short films made by Gill, one on the map itself, and the other on the history of the Bendigo Creek. Gill quotes an early observer of this creek, entranced by the sight of kingfishers and platypus. Within a short time the creek had been reduced to a channel for noxious sludge pushed 160 kilometres north of Bendigo and covering 700 square kilometres of productive land with hardened clay. The creek, says Gill, struggled to survive against early gold seekers, but was finally finished off by the puddling machine [see our post on this ingenious device]. After Royal Commission enquiry into its dreadful state, it was engineered into the gutter we know today.

The exhibition runs till June 16. Don’t miss it: and there are numerous associated talks and events.

The curious circular earth formation pictured below isn’t a mysterious religious site. It’s a puddling wheel, and if you want to know how it used to work, check out historian Marjorie Theobald’s article ‘Commissioner Bull and the Puddling Machines: Castlemaine’s first Environmental Cause’:

Puddling machine, Cobblers Gully: Circular ditches like this, with islands in the middle, are fairly common in our district. The fallen trees are recent intrusions--natural heritage at work.

‘In the years 1851-1855 the area known as the Mount Alexander gold fields, about ten square miles including the towns of Castlemaine, Chewton and Fryerstown, was ransacked by the alluvial miners; no creek was left unchanged, no gully was left unscarred, no ridge was left unpierced. Concern for the environment as we understand it today did not exist. It comes as a surprise then to find that in January 1855 Resident Gold Commissioner for Castlemaine, J.E.N. Bull, took a stand on precisely these grounds: he sent to each proprietor of a puddling machine an edict that from the 31 March 1855 these machines would be banned from the main creeks in his district. This was necessary, he wrote, to safeguard the water supply of Castlemaine, the operations of the miners using cradles and Long Toms, and the health of the creeks and flats generally.’

What happened next? To find out, check Marjorie’s excellent article on the online Central Victorian Ecology blog.

About 100 people turned up to the first public consultation meeting on flood management on February 18 at the Castlemaine Town Hall.

The meeting consisted of three presentations on flood issues by Catchment Managers and water industry experts—unfortunately rather repetitive and sometimes barely audible in the town hall acoustic. The presentations were followed by one on one discussions between officials and residents using large maps of the area.

Forest Creek/Barkers Creek junction, January 2011: at the high point of the floods water coming into the streams was five times the carrying capacity of the stream beds.

There was an expectation that this would be a fiery meeting because of dissatisfaction with the way flooding has been handled: and it was clear from this meeting that there’s still plenty of anger and pain in the community about the issue, some of those affected by floodwaters  calling for extensive clearing of vegetation along Barkers and Campbells Creeks. It’s also clear that there’s a bit of confusion in the community about who exactly is responsible for our waterways, and it’s to be hoped this can be cleared up in this process.

The main thrust of the meeting, however, was to take and assess as many ideas as possible to prevent a repeat of the damage inflicted by the floods of 2011 and 2012. Among the ideas fielded were:

• Essential services protection: the Castlemaine water treatment plant being a prime example. Flooding of this plant caused significant downstream pollution and some potentially serious health issues.
• Vegetation along creeks: there are still calls for wholesale clearance, on the assumption that ‘the flood wouldn’t have damaged houses if all those trees hadn’t been there.’ This belief is quite false [see our posts here and here]. One group in 2011 even called for the clearing of ‘all trees growing below that which would be considered the high water mark.’ This would involve demolishing about a quarter of the Botanical gardens and turning the creek system into a gigantic ditch. Nevertheless it’s clear that some management of vegetation [particularly of willows, which raise the stream bed] is justified.

Continue reading →

The Mount Alexander Shire is conducting a Rural Land Study in order to establish how rural land in the Shire should be zoned. Current zoning of rural areas derives from a 2004 State Government planning decision designed in part to protect farming land from alienation by unproductive development. The resultant system is now under attack as insensitive to local needs, and the rural land study is an effort to see how land in the shire can best be used for a variety of potentially conflicting purposes.

Agricultural land, Sandon: the rural land study aims to see how best to zone land for many distinct and sometimes conflicting values: production, scenery, biodiversity, heritage, tourism and residential development.

Information sessions on the study will be held as follows:

Thursday 14 March 2013
Baringhup Hall – 11:00am – 1:00pm Burke Street Baringhup
Metcalfe Hall – 4:00pm – 6:00pm Metcalfe-Kyneton Road, Metcalfe

Wednesday 20 March 2013
Muckleford Community Centre – 11:00pm – 1:00pm Walmer Road, Muckleford
Newstead Community Centre – 4:00pm – 6:00pm Lyons Street, Newstead

An issues paper prepared for council has listed some of the things that might come up in preparation of the study. Here are a few:

Continue reading →